The two correct options for foreseeable losses due to a breach are A and C. Option A indicates losses that are expected in the normal course of events, while Option C involves losses from special circumstances that the breaching party was aware of. Both emphasize the importance of the breaching party's knowledge in determining foreseeability.
;
In the context of contract law, foreseeability of losses following a breach is a crucial concept when determining the damages that a non-breaching party can recover.
Two main instances where a loss might be deemed foreseeable as a probable result of a breach are:
The loss follows from the breach in the ordinary course of events, which the party in breach had reason to know.
This situation refers to losses that naturally occur as a result of the breach without any special or unusual circumstances. In legal terms, this is often related to 'ordinary damages' or 'general damages.' The concept here is that since these losses are a direct consequence of the breach, they should be anticipated by the breaching party.
The loss is the result of special circumstances, beyond the ordinary course of events, which the party in breach had reason to know.
This scenario involves losses arising from unique or specific circumstances that do not usually result from a breach. These are known as 'consequential damages' or 'special damages.' For such losses to be recoverable, the breaching party must have been made aware—or had reason to know—of these special circumstances at the time the contract was made. This requirement exists so that the breaching party can take steps to either prevent the loss or to account for the risk in the contract terms.
In summary, foreseeability depends largely on the knowledge and awareness of the breaching party concerning the natural and special circumstances that might arise, leading to a loss. Understanding these principles helps ensure that parties to a contract can better assess and mitigate risks.